01
Challenge
A multi-institution review required comparable testing while recognising differences in business model, scale, customer base and inherent ML/TF exposure.
02
Approach
The programme used a common risk-based framework for governance, customer controls, screening, monitoring and reporting, with institution-specific sampling and calibrated findings.
03
Outcome
Each institution received an evidence-based view of design and operating effectiveness, while programme leadership gained cross-cutting insight into recurring control themes.
04
Impact
The experience covered over 30 regulated institutions and is identified as leadership and practitioner experience, not solely as an FCT corporate engagement.
Confidentiality: This account is deliberately anonymised and qualified. It should not be interpreted as disclosing a client relationship beyond the experience label shown.
Back to case studies